During an appearance on the talk show Maischberger, ECB President Christine Lagarde emphasized the importance of the digital euro for the future of the Eurozone. One wonders: why the sudden urgency?
Europe’s banking infrastructure is outdated. It’s simply unacceptable that in the age of digital money, real-time transactions aren’t already the norm. The European Central Bank (ECB) aims to change that by launching the so-called digital euro (CBDC) as a new payment mechanism.
The digital euro is an electronic version of the euro, developed by the ECB, intended to supplement cash and existing digital payment options. Unlike cryptocurrencies, it is state-controlled and legally embedded.
Customers would open a digital euro wallet—usually through their commercial banks—where they could manage their funds. Payments would be possible via smartphone, smartwatch, or computer—in-store, online, or peer-to-peer—in real time and usually free of charge. At least, that’s the theory.
Lagarde’s Media Blitz
As is so often the case in the EU, the real-world implementation is more complex. Commercial banks have been won over by granting them the role of gatekeepers and wallet custodians. They’ll be responsible for ID verification (digital ID) and transaction monitoring. But citizens and businesses are being left out of this fundamental shift—their input is irrelevant. Instead of democratic participation, the ECB is opting for a top-down charm offensive designed less to inform and more to persuade.
Lagarde’s appearance on German state broadcaster ARD should be seen as part of a coordinated PR campaign meant to generate acceptance in the absence of any meaningful public debate.
In a stern tone, Lagarde urged Europe’s institutions to close ranks, warning that "the clock is ticking." The ECB’s goal, she said, is to have the digital euro operational by October 2025. It won’t be just small change in digital form, she insisted, but a bulwark against geopolitical dependencies.
Lagarde was blunt: this is about nothing less than Europe’s monetary sovereignty. "We won’t get anywhere unless the Parliament, Council, and Commission deliver." The digital euro, she argued, would provide citizens and businesses with a secure alternative—from wholesale finance to personal wallets. A project meant to rethink Europe’s payments ecosystem and defend its competitiveness.
All of this sounds like pastel-colored political rhetoric—soft-focus, empty, and ultimately misleading.
Legitimacy and Structural Hurdles
The rollout of a digital euro that enables full transparency over all payment activities isn’t merely a technical endeavor—it represents a major intrusion into financial privacy. One might expect such a step to at least be democratically legitimized. But, as so often in EU-Europe, citizens are not involved in the decision-making. The digital euro risks becoming a reality without any direct mandate.
It’s the same old playbook: decisions made over people’s heads. No one’s asking whether they even want a new digital money system that could very well become the only remaining gateway to the financial system. The digital euro would not be an optional payment method—it would be a mandatory control instrument. The ECB would rise as the central authority over all transactions, becoming the most powerful institution in Europe.
From a technical perspective, chaos is almost guaranteed if the ECB actually manages to launch this massive project. Hacking will be a reality from day one. History shows that only decentralized currencies like Bitcoin are resilient and secure. Transfer platforms like Solana or Ethereum have experienced too many outages and successful attacks to be seen as stable alternatives.
Digital Euro as Capital Control
So the question remains: why this push, and why now? At its core, the digital euro would be programmable money—meaning the ECB could, in theory, approve or deny any transaction.
This would make it easy to stop capital flight in a crisis and block transfers abroad. That’s the real reason for the ECB’s initiative. Beyond simplifying tax collection, the digital euro would function as the perfect capital control tool.
Lagarde’s PR performance on Maischberger can’t paper over the grim reality of the Eurozone. Southern Europe is trapped in a fiscal bind.
Public debt levels at 120% of GDP in Spain and France—and 140% in Italy and Greece—will eventually trigger the next sovereign debt crisis. We've already seen the early tremors on bond markets in recent weeks. Japan is struggling to manage its own debt pile, now at 260% of GDP. Institutional investors are dumping long-term bonds, pushing yields higher and making debt refinancing increasingly expensive.
The Eurozone has failed to rein in its debt dynamic. In essence, we’re back to the same critical point we reached 15 years ago—when confidence in public finances began to unravel, sparking major market turmoil. The old crisis patterns are returning, this time under new branding. In Brussels and the ECB tower in Frankfurt, the belief now seems to be that coercion and control can tame the debt monster. Whether that will work remains highly doubtful.
______________
Thomas Kolbe, born in 1978 in Neuss/ Germany, is a graduate economist. For over 25 years, he has worked as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination. Follow him on Twitter/X: https://x.com/ThomKolbe.