Federal Reserve officials appeared divided at their meeting earlier this month over how much farther they may need to cut interest rates, but as a group agreed this was a moment to avoid giving much concrete guidance about how U.S. monetary policy is likely to evolve in the weeks ahead.

"Participants noted that monetary policy decisions were not on a pre-set course and were conditional on the evolution of the economy and the implications for the economic outlook ... They stressed that it would be important for the (Federal Open Market) Committee to make this clear as it adjusted its policy stance," said minutes of the Nov. 6-7 meeting, which were released Tuesday.

Participants noted the complications of making policy right now, with "many" saying that the volatility of recent economic data made it important to try to discern underlying trends, and many also observing that the uncertainty about the neutral rate of interest made it hard to determine how much current interest rates were actually suppressing economic activity.

That left some participants noting "that the Committee could pause its easing of the policy rate and hold it at a restrictive level" if inflation remained too high, and some saying that cuts could be accelerated "if the labor market turned down or economic activity faltered."

"Many" officials argued that doubts about the true stance of monetary policy "made it appropriate to reduce policy restraint gradually."

The Fed cut its benchmark policy rate by a quarter of a percentage point to the 4.50%-4.75% range at the meeting three weeks ago, a session that followed Republican candidate Donald Trump's victory in the Nov. 5 U.S. presidential election.

According to the minutes, Fed officials appeared to steer clear at this session of any discussion about the economic implications of Trump's coming return to office.

The meeting also followed stronger-than-expected economic data - "remarkable" is how Fed Chair Jerome Powell referred to it - that stoked concern monetary policy may not be restricting the economy as much as thought.

Officials since the meeting have said ongoing economic strength meant the Fed's benchmark policy rate might already be close to the "neutral" level, where it neither stimulates nor restrains activity, an argument for fewer rate cuts approved at a slower pace in order to avoid easing policy too much and possibly rekindling inflation.

Others argue the economy was likely to slow and the job market continue to weaken, which would be a reason to continue easing financial conditions to encourage spending and investment.

While investors still expect the Fed to deliver another quarter-percentage-point cut at its Dec. 17-18 meeting, the odds have slipped from greater than 80% in mid-October to just above 50% recently.