Airbus and Boeing are preparing the aerospace industry for sharp increases in output of the next generation of workhorse jets to some 100 a month each, as they explore lighter plastic materials and robotic assembly, industry sources said.

Facing weak supply chains and a potentially lengthy wait for future engine developments, the world's two largest planemakers are years away from launching projects to replace their decades-old Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 series, which remain in demand.

But both told a packed technical audience at a Paris composites fair this month that they were already making progress in researching what the succeeding generation of models could be made of - and in turn how fast they could be built.

"The goal is to recommend the best approach to transition...(to) the next airplane program," Randy Wilkerson, who represents Boeing in a NASA research project for high-capacity manufacturing called HiCAM, told the JEC World conference in Paris.

The airplanes that future models would replace are built of aluminum under methods perfected over decades. But composites are being considered for their lighter weight and flowing shape.

Already heavily used on larger jets like the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350, composites save fuel and emissions but currently need time-consuming handling in pressurized autoclave ovens.

To meet the demand for much larger numbers of small jets, both planemakers are increasingly studying manufacturing based on novel materials like thermoplastics at faster speeds.

Speakers said ongoing studies assume future production of 80 jets a month each for Airbus and Boeing: more than twice what Boeing is producing now, following a safety crisis, and higher than Airbus' repeatedly delayed target of 75 a month.

However, sources told Reuters that both planemakers are telling the composites industry they want to go even further and be ready for speeds as high as 100 a month each, a blistering pace equivalent to one roughly 200-seat jet every few hours.

Boeing and Airbus declined to comment.

THERMOPLASTICS

It's a major gamble for an industry that first used composites in the 1970s but never at such ambitious rates.

Analysts say production capacity will be as important a battleground in tomorrow's jet industry as picking the right designs, as the West faces rising competition from China.

Until now structural parts for jets like the 787 have been made of a type of composite known as thermoset, which maintains its shape and toughness once cured in autoclaves.

Possible future techniques include an evolution of the existing production system with faster curing times. "It's a lower risk approach but has a lot of potential," Wilkerson said.

Also in the mix is resin infusion - a technique typically used to make boats but which could be used to make automated production of some components without needing an autoclave.

But increasingly, thermoplastics are causing a buzz in aerospace, according to delegates at the world's largest composites event, where Airbus, GKN and others showcased part of the world's largest thermoplastic fuselage structure.

The advantage of thermoplastic is that it can be reheated and remolded to produce a single, flowing aerodynamic shape.

"You can melt it and reshape it in any way you like," said Lukas Raps of German Aerospace Centre DLR.

Such parts can also be welded using advanced methods like ultrasound rather than attached with rivets, reducing weight.

And they are less likely to need autoclaves - a major time and energy saving when contemplating large output increases.

"There (is) no doubt that thermoplastic materials offer opportunities that we don't have with thermoset," York Roth, a leading researcher at Airbus in Germany, told the conference.

Any shift to welding rather than physical titanium fasteners on structural parts could face certification hurdles.

RESEARCH CLOUT

Industry sources said the next airplanes are likely to include a mixture of approaches rather than just one technology.

Aerospace is a relatively small player in composites but punches above its weight in terms of value and research clout.

Officials stressed there was no immediate plan to launch a new plane, something that analysts have said might upset weary investors following supply chain crises and turmoil at Boeing.

"This demonstrator was never meant to fly, but it has been established to maximize learning," Roth told delegates.