On Tuesday of last week, New York City radio host Sid Rosenberg asked U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio about whether the State Department intends to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and Council on American-Islamic Relations as terrorist organizations.
Rubio responded that "all of that is in the works," although "obviously there are different branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, so you'd have to designate each one of them."
Logistics and bureaucracy aside: It's about time.
For far too long, the United States has treated the Muslim Brotherhood with a dangerous combination of naivete and willful blindness.
The Brotherhood is not a random innocuous political movement with a religious bent. It is, and has been since its founding about a century ago, the ideological wellspring of modern Sunni Islamism.
The Brotherhood's fingerprints are on jihadist groups as wide-ranging as al-Qaeda and Hamas, yet successive American administrations — Republican and Democratic alike — have failed to designate its various offshoots for what they are: terrorist organizations.
That failure is not merely academic.
It has real-world consequences.
By refusing to label the Muslim Brotherhood accurately, we tie our own hands in the fight against Islamism — both at home and abroad. We allow subversive actors to exploit our political system and bankroll extremism under the guise of "cultural" or "charitable" outreach.
Enough is enough.
Founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, the Muslim Brotherhood's stated mission has never wavered: the establishment of a global caliphate governed by sharia law.
The Brotherhood has always attempted to position itself as a "political" organization, but it is "political" in the way Lenin was political. Think subversion through infiltration — or revolution through stealth.
Consider Hamas. Hamas is not merely inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood — it is the Muslim Brotherhood's Palestinian-Arab branch.
The link is unambiguous; as Article Two of Hamas' founding charter states, "The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine."
And Hamas' charter also makes clear its penchant for explicit violence: "Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement."
This is not the rhetoric of nuance or moderation.
This is the ideological foundation of contemporary jihadism.
Yet, while Hamas is rightly designated as a "foreign terrorist organization" by the U.S. State Department, other branches of the Muslim Brotherhood remain off the list.
Why?
Because Western elites have allowed themselves to be duped by the Muslim Brotherhood's two-faced strategy. Abroad, they openly sow the seeds of jihad, cheer for a global caliphate, and preach for the destruction of Israel and Western civilization more broadly.
But in the corridors of power in the U.S. and Europe, they and their Qatari paymasters don suits and ties, rebrand as "moderates," and leverage media credulity and overly generous legal protections to plant poisonous ideological roots.
What's more, CAIR — an unindicted coconspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history — has extremely well-documented ties to the Brotherhood.
And yet CAIR agents continue to operate freely in the U.S., masquerading as civil rights advocates while pushing Islamist narratives that undermine the core constitutional principles of equality they purport to champion.
Today, almost two years after CAIR-linked Hamas executed the barbaric Oct. 7, 2023 pogrom in Israel, CAIR remains in good standing with many elected Democrats.
It shouldn't be so.
In November 2014, the United Arab Emirates designated CAIR as a terrorist organization, citing its links to the Brotherhood and Hamas.
And the Brotherhood itself is recognized as a terrorist organization by at least Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Bahrain and Russia.
Jordan also banned the Brotherhood earlier this year.
Put bluntly: There is absolutely no reason the U.S. should have a warmer approach toward CAIR than the UAE or a warmer approach toward the Brotherhood than Saudi Arabia.
The first Trump administration flirted with the idea of designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization.
It was the right impulse.
But the effort was ultimately bogged down by internal bureaucracy and global pressure— most notably from Qatar and Turkey, both sometime U.S. partners that harbor strong Brotherhood sympathies and bankroll Islamist causes.
And the second Trump administration's troubling embrace of Qatar may well nip any designation in the bud before it even takes off.
Critics argue that such a designation would complicate relations with countries where Brotherhood affiliates participate in local politics.
But since when did the U.S. place a premium on building alliances with the ideological cousins of al-Qaida and ISIS?
Moreover, designating the Muslim Brotherhood would empower domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies to go after its networks and financial infrastructure.
It would send a clear signal that the U.S. government no longer accepts a claim of "nonviolent Islamism" as a pass when designating terrorist groups.
In a time when the threat from Islamic extremism remains global and decentralized, we can no longer afford to turn a blind eye to the architects of the entire movement.
The Muslim Brotherhood is not, as "Arab Spring" boosters risibly claimed a decade and a half ago, a Western partner in "democracy." It is the mother's milk of modern Sunni jihadism.
The question is not, as some pro-Qatar apologists might suggest, whether we can afford to designate Muslim Brotherhood offshoots as terrorist organizations.
It is: How much longer can we afford not to?
Josh Hammer is the Senior Editor-at-Large of Newsweek, and is host of "The Josh Hammer Show" podcast. He also authors the weekly newsletter, "The Josh Hammer Report." Josh is also a syndicated columnist through Creators Syndicate, and a research fellow at the Edmund Burke Foundation. Read Josh Hammer's Reports — Here.