House to Consider Next Steps on Gaetz Ethics Report

The House is expected to consider Thursday what to do with a report on alleged sexual misconduct and drug use by former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who has dropped his bid to become President-elect Donald Trump's attorney general.

A pair of Gaetz-related meetings are planned.

The House Ethics Committee, which had probed the allegations, is expected to meet to discuss what to do with the findings of its investigation of Gaetz, according to a source with knowledge of the panel's plans, who was granted anonymity to discuss its inner workings.

Thursday is also the deadline for the full Republican-controlled House to consider a motion to force the panel to release its report on Gaetz, 42, who resigned from Congress in November hours after Trump tapped him as a potential attorney general.

Gaetz has denied all wrongdoing.

Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill., who is leading the procedural maneuver to allow other House members to vote on whether to publicly release the Gaetz report, cited at least four examples since 1987 of the ethics panel continuing its work and releasing investigative findings after a representative resigns from Congress.

The House could vote on the proposal itself – which would require Republican support to pass – or simply vote to quash it.

The Ethics Committee – made up of five Republicans and five Democrats – is also expected to vote on potentially releasing the committee's investigative findings into Gaetz. The panel deadlocked along party lines in a similar vote last month.

At the time, the committee's Republican chairman, Rep. Michael Guest, R-Miss., told reporters he had "reservations" about releasing the report because it was not yet complete. The committee's top Democrat, Rep. Susan Wild, D-Pa., said there was no unanimity within the panel on how to move forward with the probe.

The Ethics Committee only has jurisdiction over current members of Congress. Because Gaetz has said he does not plan to return for next year's congressional session beginning in January, several Republicans have argued the investigation should be privately concluded.